|
Table of Contents:
-Policy
Scope
-Mission
Statement
-Statement
of Policy
Issues:
ENVIRONMENT,
ENERGY & DEVELOPMENT
Agriculture
Clean Air
Community Development
Endangered Species
Energy
Growth Issues
Indoor Air Quality
Land Use
Lead Based Paint
Open Space
Property Rights
Wetlands
HOUSING
Condominiums and Cooperatives
Equal Opportunity
Housing for Low- and Moderate-Income Occupants
Housing for the Elderly and Handicapped
Psychologically Impacted Properties
Rental Housing
Sign Ordinances
Time Sharing
TAXATION
State and Local Real Estate Taxation
Assessment Practices
Impact Fees
Spending Limitation
Tax Exempt Properties
Tax Limitation/Reform
Transfer Tax
RISK
REDUCTION
REGULATORY
ISSUES
BUSINESS PRACTICES
Agency Practices
Appraisal Standards
Business Mobility
Consumer Protection
State Ownership and Leasing of Public Buildings
Government Intervention, Regulation and Control
Group Investment in Real Estate
Seller Property Condition Disclosure
Confiscation of Real Property
REAL
ESTATE FINANCE
ALTERNATIVE MORTAGE INSTRUMENTS
Automated Underwriting, Credit, and Mortgage Scoring
Financial Entities Involvement in Real Estate
Mortgage Credit Availability
Secondary Mortgage Market Institutions
POSITIONS
ON OTHER CURRENT ISSUES
Community Revitalization
Community Service
Education and Research
General Statement of Housing Policy
Independent Contractor Relationship
International Real Estate and Foreign Investment
License Law
Policy Scope
The Utah Association of REALTORS® Statement of
Policy is intended to address issues that the UAR’s
Legislative Committee deals with at the Utah Legislature
and through its federal representatives and senators
to the United States Congress. For further guidance
on federal issues, please refer to the National Association
of REALTORS® Statement of Policy.
Mission Statement
The purpose of the UTAH ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
is to serve its members representing all facets of
the real estate industry by providing and promoting
programs and services to enhance members’ freedom
and ability to conduct their businesses successfully,
with integrity and competency, and through collective
action to promote the preservation and extension of
the right to own, transfer and use real property.
(Source: 1997 UAR Business Plan)
Statement of Policy
The UTAH ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
is dedicated to the protection and the preservation
of the free enterprise system and the right of the
individual to own real property as guaranteed by the
Constitutions of the United States of America and
the State of Utah. To that end, we offer the benefits
our knowledge of real estate, our experience, and
our technical resources bring to the public in general
and the government that serves them. Because we are
concerned with a number of issues facing our members
and the State of Utah, the following statement of
the principles underlying our policy recommendations
is provided so that the public will better understand
the specific positions on current issues in the remainder
of this book.
We believe in the free enterprise system, and oppose
undue intervention by the government in the affairs
of American business. We oppose counterproductive
taxation, governmental guidelines, regulations, rules
and procedures which unnecessarily increase consumer
costs and unnecessarily burden the business community.
We believe that the political stability and economic
prosperity of the United States of America is dependent
in large measure upon the right of the individual
to own and freely transfer real property and to exercise
and enjoy the benefits of ownership. Because we strongly
support the full and free exercise of this right,
we oppose actions by governments, groups, or individuals
which diminish or deny it, and we will concern ourselves
with legislation, regulations and litigation which
impact on real estate and the REALTOR®
organization.
We will continue to be responsive to the increasing
needs of our members for direct and indirect economic
and professional benefits and services by striving
to increase the professional image, standards and
productivity of our members. The growing specialized
and diversified needs of the members of the various
disciplines in the real estate industry in domestic
and international markets are also of major importance
to our organization. Thus, we will work to ensure
that our members in both non-residential and residential
specialties provide the highest quality services to
their clients, while addressing the continually changing
nature of brokerage and business practices in real
estate, including the professional and liability concerns
of our members. To this end, we will inform our membership
of domestic and international real estate business
trends and practices, the effects of changing demographics,
promote the benefits of additional real estate education
and develop new ways of assisting real estate specialties.
We will also work to build coalitions and work with
other trade groups, professional associations, and
firms in areas such as education programs, legislation,
services, marketing and membership.
We believe that homeownership serves as a cornerstone
of our democratic system of government and deserves
a preferred place in our system of values as it contributes
to community responsibility; civic, economic, business,
and employment stability; family security; and well
being. As real estate professionals we know that homeownership
is a primary goal of American families. We also believe
that every individual should have the opportunity
to live in safe and decent housing. These objectives
can best be served by a healthy housing market in
an economic environment that fosters an ample supply
of affordable and accessible financing provided by
both domestic and international sources.
We firmly believe in equal opportunity in housing.
No person of this country should have the right to
rent or purchase shelter of choice abridged because
of race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial
status or national origin. Furthermore, these rights
should not be limited because of existing or desired
ethnic, racial or religious proportions in any defined
area.
We encourage persons of all racial and ethnic groups,
both sexes, with and without disabilities, and individuals
otherwise protected from discrimination by the Fair
Housing Act, are encouraged to participate at all
levels within the REALTOR® Associations.
We believe in and support policies that promote the
healthy growth of the American economy. Investment
in structures, in equipment, and in the skills of
people is necessary to increase the standard of living,
jobs and household income. To accomplish these goals,
we urge changes in tax policy that will encourage
savings, investment and homeownership.
We believe that active involvement in political activity
is a privilege and responsibility of every citizen.
We urge qualified individuals to make themselves available
for public service. We encourage continuing participation
in local, state, and national political affairs and
urge support of those candidates who pledge and by
their actions preserve, and indeed strengthen, America's
free enterprise system which is based upon the underlying
principle of private property ownership.
ENVIRONMENT,
ENERGY & DEVELOPMENT
Open Space Policy
As The Voice for Real
Estate™ in Utah, the Utah Association of
REALTORS® recognizes its obligation to provide
guidance on issues affecting the land within our borders
and the people who own, buy, sell, pay taxes on and
enjoy that land. Moreover, the UAR believes that land
use policy affects the quality of life in Utah. To
that end, in 1998 the UAR formed an Open Space Task
Force to study the issues relating to growth, land-use
planning, and the preservation of open space, and
evaluate proposals to address the aforementioned issues.
What is open space? The
term "open space" means different things to different
people. Open space could be a park in Murray City,
a farm, a cemetery, a "riverwalk" along City Creek
in Salt Lake City or the Jordan River, or wilderness.
However, to foster predictability in land-use planning,
the UAR believes that it is incumbent upon local governments
to define what "open space" means for their communities.
The UAR appreciates the
efforts of groups like Envision Utah to inform citizens
how growth patterns affect land consumption, population
density, and infrastructural costs. Some facts, however,
must be considered when addressing open space in Utah.
Utah consists of approximately
54,335,500 acres (84,916 square miles). As of 1992,
1.0 percent of the land in Utah had been developed.
(By comparison, 1.8 percent of the State of Oregon
had been developed in the same year.) (Source: Natural
Resources Conservation Service.) Envision Utah’s scenarios
A, B, C and D for total land consumption along the
Wasatch Front in the year 2020 range from 516 to 840
square miles (newly developed land ranges from 85
to 409 square miles). (Source: Envision Utah.)
The federal government
owns or controls approximately 67 percent of the land
in Utah (including land controlled by the Bureau of
Indian Affairs). The State of Utah owns or controls
approximately 10 percent of the land within its borders
(including lakes and trust lands). A substantial portion
of the remaining 23 percent of land in Utah is not
developable because of geographic or legal limitations
(e.g., slope, wetlands, instability, and/or conservation
easements). (Source: School and Institutional Trust
Lands Administration.)
In 1996, the Los Angeles
metropolitan area had a population density of 5490
people per square mile and the New York metropolitan
area had a population density of about 4119 per square
mile. By comparison, the 1996 population densities
per square mile for Salt Lake City, Provo-Orem, and
Ogden are 2441, 1831, and 1542, respectively. (Source:
Federal Highway Administration.) Envision Utah’s
scenarios C & D indicate a population density
on the Wasatch Front in 2020 of about 4838 per square
mile and 5222 per square mile, respectively. (Source:
Envision Utah.)
The UAR believes that
the definition of open space may not be as important
as those policies that authorize government action
to preserve open space.
PRESERVATION
OF OPEN SPACE
Private individuals and
organizations, both alone or with some government
assistance, are already doing much to preserve open
space. The creation of land trusts and conservation
easements are some of the many ways people are using
their own initiative, resources, and creativity to
establish an environment they want.
What shouldn’t
be done to preserve open space? In the early 1970s,
the Utah Association of REALTORS® joined with
most Utahns in rejecting a proposal for statewide
land-use planning, and that opposition continues today.
The State of Utah and the federal government should
minimize their involvement in land use decisions and
not withhold government grants and programs to enforce
their policies.
The UAR believes in
the fundamental right of all private property owners
to determine the highest and best use of their land,
working through appropriate governmental entities,
preferably at the local level.
Programs of resource, land and historic preservation
designed to protect aquifers, agricultural lands,
wetlands, scenic vistas, natural areas, historic properties
and open space, may have a positive effect on the
quality of life and environment in towns, counties,
and municipalities. Land use laws and regulations
enacted for the purpose of protecting and enhancing
these resources provide benefits to the general public
and the costs should thus be borne by the general
public.
The UAR recognizes that
local governments may require funding to preserve
open space. We encourage local governments to find
creative ways to finance open space preservation that
reduces reliance on tax revenues. The UAR believes
that new tax sources to preserve open space must be
subject to voter approval.
Planning for the classification
and use of land must adequately consider the needs
of housing, agricultural, commercial and industrial
growth, as well as quality of life and a healthy local
economy. Land-use planning should also take into account
the impact of planning on housing affordability.
Each community in Utah
should provide its fair share of affordable housing,
rather than export their posterity to neighboring
cities. To that end, the UAR supports the current
state requirement on local governments to report on
their efforts to provide affordable housing in their
communities. The UAR would also support the reform
of local zoning ordinances which currently forbid
more efficient uses of land, such as "clustered housing"
developments.
Agriculture
We urge
that when the issue of agricultural land protection
is addressed, all economic factors and private property
rights be fully considered before government agencies
impose any restrictions on the foreign or corporate
ownership or the conversion of agricultural land to
non-agricultural purposes.
Clean
Air
We support
the need to monitor air quality and maintain minimum
standards of air quality that are based on verifiable
scientific evidence. The State of Utah and/or local
governments should have input into the development
and application of federal clean air standards. Further,
regulators are encouraged to examine and accommodate
local diversity when defining federal guidelines.
We support the role of
the federal government to: establish national ambient
air quality standards for criteria pollutants and
make findings on interstate air pollution issues that
are based on verifiable scientific evidence; set minimum
standards for emissions of hazardous air pollutants
based on verifiable health risks; and establish minimum
standards for emission from mobile sources.
Furthermore, we believe
that the State of Utah should be responsible for monitoring
air quality and developing programs to attain and
maintain clean air standards. The State of Utah should
be provided with adequate funding to carry out the
minimum federal standards. State and local program
standards which exceed federal minimum standards should
balance air quality with economic development. Innovative
solutions and market incentives are preferable to
government imposed penalties and should be strongly
encouraged.
Community
Development
REALTORS®
, as business people in their community, have
a stake in the long term health of neighborhoods.
Community revitalization is important to the development
of a competitive local economy. The growth of local
economies can be stagnated if new jobs and migration
are not matched in terms of homeownership opportunities
in attractive, viable neighborhoods.
Both the public and private
sector have a mutual interest in maintaining their
community and in making their neighborhoods a better
place to raise a family, shop, work and invest. Homeownership
leads to a greater interest in community affairs,
better maintenance and a keener sense of neighborhoods.
Thus, an interest in community development issues
provides a stake in the community and in this nation's
economic prosperity.
The UTAH ASSOCIATION
OF REALTORS® recommends that the following
elements be incorporated in the design of local community
development programs:
* Programs should meet
community needs as determined by each locality --
whether inner city or rural, using measures such as
existing community facilities, extent of poverty,
economic growth, population changes and unemployment.
* Programs should have
the objective of creating viable neighborhoods by
providing economic opportunities.
* Programs should be
directed toward the revitalization of neighborhoods
including the preservation and development of housing
and improved community facilities and services.
* Programs should encourage
public/private partnerships whenever possible.
Endangered
Species
We believe
the way in which the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
is implemented is of major importance. We support
amendments to the Threatened and Endangered Species
Act that recognize socioeconomic considerations and
provide safeguards to protect property rights in the
manner described in the NAR Statement of Policy on
Property Rights. In particular, revisions to the Endangered
Species Act should address the following:
Incentives provided to
private property owners for species protection rather
than relying solely on restrictions and penalties.
A strict limitation on
how far down the chain of sub-species will be allowed
in listings.
Listings of threatened
or endangered based on verifiable scientific evidence.
Prompt notification to
private property owners regarding potential species
listings that might impact their property.
Increased local involvement
in creating and implementing recovery plans.
Incorporation of substantial
equivalency provisions for states that currently have
adequate legislation.
Express written permission
of the property owner prior to implementation of a
National Biological Survey of private property.
Independent peer review
committees should review both the scientific evidence
and economic impacts of all listings.
Periodic review and expedited
delisting of species when supported by verifiable
scientific evidence.
Energy
The free
market system is the most appropriate means of attaining
energy conservation and production goals. Increased
conservation and domestic expansion and development
of existing and new energy sources are essential to
our nation's security and economic prosperity.
We support continued
efforts by the Federal government to remove regulatory
impediments to the discovery, production, transportation,
and sale of energy resources.
We support the Federal
government's role in contingency planning for severe
energy supply disruptions.
We support the role of
the Federal government in joining with private enterprise
to reach and develop alternative energy sources.
We support the concept
of positive incentives for conservation activities
such as energy tax credits. We support increased emphasis
on energy efficient technology by the building industry.
We believe that in order
to maintain a healthy diversity in the economy the
federal government should be particularly sensitive
to the over-regulation of our country’s natural resources.
The government should implement programs that will
provide our nation with the natural resources needed
to create affordable housing.
We support the State
of Utah’s involvement in the development and application
of natural resource reclamation laws. Further, regulators
are encouraged to examine and accommodate local diversity
when developing federal guidelines. In addition, financial
assurance should be guaranteed in an effort to make
certain that reclamation of land is completed.
Growth
Issues
We recognize
that growth is an issue facing many areas of our country.
We believe that growth should be encouraged as it
is a stimulus to the economy, increases the tax base,
provides places to live and work, and offers opportunities
that would not otherwise exist.
We also realize the responsibility
we have to educate and work with local, state, and
federal government officials in developing responsible
growth planning that is equitable and which considers
the divergent needs of transportation, housing, agriculture,
commercial, industrial, and environmental concerns.
Government growth planning activities must take into
account property rights in the manner described in
the NAR Statement of Policy on Property Rights.
Indoor
Air Quality
We believe
that all Americans are entitled to enjoy an indoor
living environment where risks to health and welfare
from pollution are minimized. Increased efforts by
both the private and public sectors should be encouraged
to characterize and evaluate the extent of indoor
air quality problems and to encourage the development
of meaningful and affordable monitoring and mitigation
strategies.
We support federal indoor
air quality research and information dissemination.
We support both efforts
to educate homeowners as to their responsibility to
identify and disclose to real estate brokers or agents
any known environmental hazards presenting a significant
risk to health; and efforts by the UTAH ASSOCIATION
OF REALTORS® to determine the desirability of
disclosure language in listings and contracts of sale.
We urge all Americans
who are in areas identified with high levels of radon
to test their homes to determine if elevated levels
of radon gas are present. We support increased education
of homeowners so that they will become aware of potential
radon problems and of their responsibility to disclose
to real estate brokers or agents indoor air problems
that present a significant risk to health. We oppose
nationwide mandatory radon testing at the time of
transfer of real property.
Any regulation of asbestos
in buildings should be based on scientifically-proven
significant levels of exposure and hazard to the public.
Such regulation should allow reasonable time periods
in which to comply with regulations, provide flexibility
in how to comply, require comprehensive training and
certification for asbestos abatement contractors and
laboratory technicians, and provide for a "prioritization"
of regulation with respect to the particular hazard
posed by certain building types and classes.
Land
Use
We believe in the fundamental
right of all private property owners to determine
the highest and best use of their land, working through
appropriate governmental entities.
Programs of resource,
land and historic preservation designed to protect
aquifers, agricultural lands, wetlands, scenic vistas,
natural areas, historic properties and open space,
may have a positive effect on the quality of life
and environment in towns, counties, and municipalities.
Land use laws and regulations enacted for the purpose
of protecting and enhancing these resources provide
benefits to the general public and the costs should
thus be borne by the general public. (See Property
Rights section).
The State of Utah and
the federal government should minimize their involvement
in land use decisions and not withhold government
grants and programs to enforce their policies.
Planning for the classification
and use of land must adequately consider the needs
of housing, agricultural, commercial and industrial
growth, as well as quality of life and a healthy local
economy. Land use planning should also take into account
the impact of planning on housing affordability.
We shall continue to
develop programs and seek legislation to help the
UAR and its member local boards achieve these objectives.
Lead
Based Paint
Lead should
be viewed as a public health issue. We support increased
education of all homeowners about lead so that they
will become aware of, and motivated to test for, potential
health hazards. Legislative and administrative efforts
should be directed at the general public, rather than
focused on the real estate transaction and we strongly
oppose any form of mandatory testing tied to the real
estate transaction process. We support efforts to
identify and re
duce the
potential health threat that the presence of lead
may pose.
The UTAH ASSOCIATION
OF REALTORS® supports inclusion of the following
in legislation addressing residential lead-based paint
hazards:
Single-family and multi-family
sales of homes built prior to 1978:
A. Seller disclosure.
Before entering into
the sales contract, it is the responsibility of the
seller to:
1. provide a lead hazard information pamphlet;
2. disclose any known lead paint or lead hazard in
the premises, as well as, any lead inspection report
of which the seller is aware.
Each sales contract must include a lead warning statement
and a statement signed by the purchaser acknowledging
that he/she has:
1. read and understood the lead warning statement
in the contract;
2. received a lead hazard information pamphlet from
the seller.
Premises may be tested only if mutually agreed upon
by the parties. Placing the lead hazard warning and
signature on a separate sheet is unnecessary, but
the relevant section in the contract should be signed
by the purchaser.
B. Leasing of Single and Multi-Family Properties:
The UTAH ASSOCIATION
OF REALTORS® strongly opposes any form of mandatory
testing tied to the real estate transaction process.
A decision to test or not test should be left to the
discretion of the lessor and potential lessee depending
upon the circumstances in all cases lessee would have
to provide lessor with a copy of the test results.
The UAR would not oppose legislation which included
the following:
Lessors shall notify
existing residential tenants of potential lead hazards
on a property by providing them with a lead hazard
information pamphlet. Lessor could choose to test,
lessee could waive having testing done and assume
the risk of remaining in the premises, or lessee could
test at their own expense. If a lessee was concerned
about lead hazards being present and the property
either had not been tested or had been tested and
was not certified as lead-safe, they could terminate
the lease within a reasonable period of time. If the
lessor complies with the above requirements, they
would be considered relieved from liability.
Lessor shall provide all potential lessees with a
lead hazard information pamphlet for properties constructed
before 1978. In addition, every lease for a residential
dwelling constructed before 1978 shall contain standardized
lead hazard disclosure and warning language. The lessor
and lessee would have three options available to them:
Lessee could waive any opportunity to have the premises
tested;
Lessor could agree to test the premises at his expense;
or,
Lessor could refuse to test the premises. In such
cases, lessee could have the lead test done at their
own expense. Lessee would retain the right to rescind
a lease if the test results were positive. In all
cases, lessee would have to provide lessor with a
copy of the test results.
C. General concepts to be included in any lead
legislation passed by Congress:
1. Recognizing that lead hazards are a national health
issue and not a housing issue, in the event the United
States Congress passes a law relative to mandatory
blood testing for lead, the UTAH ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
would then support the position that sellers or lessors
retain the option of requiring purchasers or lessees
to provide copies of the latest blood test results
of any children who are to occupy a property prior
to its sale or lease.
2. The UAR supports the goal of assuring that residential
properties be made "lead-safe" rather than "lead-free".
3. The UAR supports the "innocent owner" concept,
to encourage owners to take voluntary action to eliminate
lead hazards. The legal liability of the owner should
be limited to the reduction of any lead hazard to
a "lead-safe" level.
4. The UAR supports the addition of language to the
bill limiting the liability of sellers and lessors
who comply with the bill's provisions. We support
the addition of the following language: "A seller
or lessor of residential property and/or their agent
shall have no liability under this Act or any other
provision of federal, state, local or common law for
any lead-related injury to any person resulting from
occupancy of the premises sold or leased if the seller
or lessor has complied with the requirements of this
Act."
Absent the addition of such a liability limiting provision,
the UAR would support amendments to federal, state
and local Fair Housing laws to allow sellers or lessors
to refuse to rent to families with children in cases
where there are known lead hazards on a property which
would place the child's health at risk.
5. The UAR supports federal financial incentives and
relief to encourage the abatement and/or encapsulation
of lead hazards in residential premises.
6. The UAR opposes making lead hazard testing a pre-requisite
for qualifying for any federally-backed mortgage insurance
or guarantee under FHA, Farmers Home Administration,
Veterans Administration or any other governmental
or quasi-governmental entity.
7. The UAR supports the inclusion of legislative language
prohibiting lending and insurance institutions from
refusing to lend or grant liability insurance on properties
solely because they may contain potential lead hazards.
Property
Rights
Governments
shall not arbitrarily infringe on the basic right
of the individual to acquire, possess and freely transfer
real property, and shall protect private property
rights as referred to in the 5th and l4th Amendments
of the United States Constitution.
We support legislative
implementation of the 5th Amendment's guarantee of
compensation when property rights are taken. Every
person should have the right to acquire real property
with confidence and certainty that the use or value
of such property will not be wholly or substantially
eliminated by governmental action at any level without
just compensation or the owner's express consent.
We recognize the need
for all levels of government to be able to exercise
legitimate police powers in the regulation of private
property to protect the health, safety and general
welfare of its citizens. However, when government
actions or regulations are not founded within legitimate
police powers, the government should be required to
pay compensation for the inordinate burden levied
on the property owner.
In addition, we support
legislation that provides property owners with expeditious
access to administrative and judicial systems at all
levels - local, state and federal - to pursue Fifth
Amendment takings claims or relief from other property
rights violations.
Wetlands
Recognizing
the environmental significance of wetlands, we believe
that any wetland legislation should include language
to provide for:
A standardized definition for identification of wetlands
which includes hydrophilic vegetation, hydric soils
and hydrology, and which results in a program that
focuses on important wetlands habitats;
A clearly defined permitting process which should
improve the efficiency of the program, provide binding
time limits for the agencies, and provide a guaranteed
right of administrative appeal in order to reduce
costly, unnecessary and contentious litigation;
A program which recognizes that all wetlands are not
the same and classifies wetlands by their functions
and values; the strictness of the regulatory requirements
should be tailored to reflect the varying importance
of these qualities;
The requirement that all authorities with wetlands
regulatory powers notify affected property owners
whenever wetlands inventories are to be conducted
in the State of Utah;
The use of wetlands mitigation banking as a tool to
both reduce the cost of compliance with mitigation
requirements and to increase the effectiveness and
environmental benefits associated with permitted mitigation
activities;
A "single contact" wetlands regulation process which
would eliminate the duplicity of dealing with multiple
regulatory agencies.
HOUSING
Condominiums and Cooperatives
Condominium and cooperative forms
of ownership are legitimate shelter resources providing
important, economically attractive options for consumers.
*To further the goal of making this affordable form
of homeownership more available there is a need for
the government agencies involved with condominium
and cooperative financing to continue to streamline
and update their policies.
*We oppose all unreasonably restrictive requirements
regarding the conversion of rental housing units into
condominium and cooperative forms of homeownership.
*We propose as a guide for state legislation the
use of the Uniform Condominium Act and similar acts
for cooperatives and the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTOR®
Condominium Legislation Recommended Criteria, utilizing
each as best applicable for the individual state.
*We believe that the Uniform Common Interest Ownership
Act should not be adopted by the Utah Legislature
because there is no need to extend such a broad regulating
process to every type of planned community.
*In order to avoid large special assessments of unit
owners for unanticipated expenses and to protect condominium
and homeowner associations' board of directors liability
for a possible breach of their fiduciary responsibility
to the association, we call on all condominium and
homeowner associations to establish and sustain an
adequate reserve account policy for capital and contingency
items. We recommend the following actions be taken
in implementing such a policy.
*To establish an adequate reserves policy each association
should prepare, and disclose to each unit owner, a
pro forma operating budget, projecting the estimated
revenues, expenses, reserves for replacement of capital
assets and contingency reserves, and identifying the
estimated life and replacement costs of all capital
assets.
*The pro forma budget, including reserves, should
be prepared or reviewed by an independent professional
third party.
*In establishing the initial budget by the developer,
special caution should be taken to accurately estimate
potential operating costs and long-term assets.
Equal Opportunity
We subscribe to the policy of fair housing;
we believe that equal opportunity in housing can best
be achieved through continued leadership, observance
of law, education and mutual cooperation of the real
estate industry and the public through a free and
open housing market. The Federal Fair Housing Law
and the Utah Fair Housing Act provide for the right
of all people to freely choose where they will live
without regard to race, color, religion, sex, disability,
familial status, national origin or source of income.
We believe the Congress should act promptly to make
it clear that national policy as set forth in the
Federal Fair Housing Law mandates free housing choice.
The NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®‘
Code of Equal Opportunity is the REALTORS®‘
affirmative pledge to offer equal service to all persons
without regard to race, color, religion, sex, handicap,
familial status or national origin.
We urge Congress to define the purpose of the Federal
Fair Housing Law promptly so as to make it clear that
the law mandates free choice in housing as opposed
to systems of quotas or allocations.
We oppose all restrictive laws or ordinances that
inhibit the free and open market for real property,
such as "For Sale" sign bans, and anti-solicitation
laws.
We fully accept our responsibility to make all people
aware of the obligations and advantages of a strict
compliance with the spirit as well as the letter of
the Federal Fair Housing Laws.
Housing for Low- and Moderate-Income Occupants
We encourage continued examination of the level and
types of efforts within the public and private sector
that are currently being utilized or contemplated
to respond to the needs of the low- and moderate-income
housing occupants.
We encourage the use of existing housing inventory
in providing low- to moderate-income housing.
We believe that housing for low- and moderate-income
rental occupants is best managed by the private sector.
While supporting the use of incentives to encourage
property owners wishing to prepay their federally-assisted
loans to retain their units as low- and moderate-income
housing, we oppose the enactment of state legislation
that imposes disincentives to the prepayment of federally-assisted
loans issued under the Section 221(d)(3) and 236 programs
of the National Housing Act which exceed the controls
implemented by federal legislation on those programs.
Housing for the Elderly and Handicapped
We acknowledge actions taken by all
levels of government to reduce impediments to handicapped
and elderly persons in the acquisition of housing
and urge REALTORS® to continue providing
guidance for needed, cost-effective solutions to their
housing needs.
Psychologically Impacted Properties
We support legislation to declare that
all psychological impacts or stigmas which are associated
with past owners or occupants of real property are
not material facts and need not be disclosed to a
potential purchaser or lessee.
Rental Housing
We recognize the need in this nation to produce new
affordable rental housing and preserve the current
rental housing stock through recycling and renovation.
We call on all levels of government to meet this demand
by removing disincentives to the financing, production
and improvement of rental housing for citizens of
all income levels.
* Local moratoria on converting rental property to
condominiums or cooperatives, costly and administratively
burdensome regulations and restrictions are all examples
of disincentives to initial investment in rental projects.
Owners of rental property should provide safe and
decent housing for the needs of their rental occupants;
rental occupants must recognize and accept their legal
responsibility to maintain and care for the property
and safety of their fellow occupants. The rights given
each party under basic contract law should be enforced.
We encourage and support legislation as well as legal
measures to prevent landlord-tenant ordinances injurious
to the basic rights of private property ownership.
Sign Ordinances
We believe that REALTORS®
have the right to advertise properties on the open
market through the use of solicitation generally and
real estate "For Sale" signs specifically. We encourage
REALTORS® to work with local government
to assist them in determining a sign ordinance program
that will allow REALTORS® to market
their clients' properties.
Time Sharing
The State of Utah, rather than the Federal
government, should regulate time sharing, which the
State of Utah has done through the Timeshare and Camp
Resort Act, which provides legal recognition of time
sharing as a legitimate property interest and authorizes
regulation through the Division of Real Estate in
the best interests of both consumers and the industry.
*The major element of time sharing regulation should
be disclosure requirements concerning such matters
as status of title, association budgets and assessments,
management, exchange programs, and sales inducements.
* Although many time sharing transactions are conducted
interstate, the controlling legislation should be
that of the state where the property is located.
* Recognizing that a degree of uniformity among applicable
state laws is desirable, we recommend the Model Real
Estate Time Share Act as a guide to the extent the
State of Utah finds it feasible.
* Time sharing, as an interest in real property,
should be supervised by the appropriate real estate
regulatory body.
* Those engaged in selling time shares should hold
state real estate licenses.
TAXATION
STATE AND LOCAL REAL ESTATE TAXATION
Assessment Practices
We support laws providing for tax assessment of all
real property and all forms of shelter on an equitable
basis based on fair market value.
Impact Fees
Fees for services should not hamper
or deter development in our communities and should
not be used to correct existing deficiencies. We urge
that governments limit any use of such fees to providing
public capital improvements necessitated by new developments.
Spending Limitation
We support the principle and concept of maintaining
a balanced budget in all political jurisdictions.
Balanced state, local, county and national budgets
should be maintained by reducing unnecessary expenditures,
sunsetting, capping and/or reducing the growth of
programs and services that are not essential.
Tax Exempt Properties
All tax exempt institutions, including
but not limited to municipal, legitimate religious,
charitable and educational organizations should be
required to pay for local public services received,
but should maintain their real property exemption
due to their positive contributions to the communities
in which they reside.
In those instances where tax exempt institutions
occupy only a portion of larger land holdings, those
sections of the properties not directly used by the
institutions should be fully taxed. Many religious,
cultural, educational, civic, fraternal institutions
and the like maintain real estate holdings that do
not have any direct relationship to the purpose for
which the institution is established. Indeed, many
such holdings are made for purely investment purposes,
yet enjoy tax benefits at a cost to those who pay
taxes. Such holdings should be fully taxed.
Tax Limitation/Reform
Property taxes may place an undue burden on the acquisition
and ownership of real property. We support tax restructuring
to reduce unreasonable reliance upon property taxes.
Transfer Tax
The ability to purchase real property
contributes directly to Utah’s economy. Transfer taxes
place a major burden of taxation on the buyers and
sellers at the time of settlement and places an unreasonable
burden on real property ownership and economic development.
The UAR opposes the use of transfer taxes at all levels
of government.
RISK REDUCTION
To promote professionalism and better serve the buying
and selling public, we support programs to reduce
the legal liability of REALTOR® and
REALTOR-ASSOCIATE®s. These programs
include comprehensive legal education, alternatives
to civil litigation to resolve disputes, and reasonably
priced errors and omissions insurance for brokers
and salespersons. We further encourage our individual
members and local boards to create risk reduction
committees to promote these objectives.
REGULATORY ISSUES
BUSINESS PRACTICES
Agency Practices
The UTAH Association of Realtors®
recognizes seller agency, buyer agency, and limited
agency with informed consent, as appropriate forms
of consumer representation in real estate transactions.
The Association represents the need for all REALTORS®
to be able to make individual business decisions about
their companies' agency practices. Furthermore, the
UAR endorses freedom of choice and informed consent
for consumers of real estate services when creating
agency relationships with real estate licensees.
Appraisal Standards
We have adopted the following positions
on appraisal standards:
*To support licensing and certification of appraisers.
* To support the minimum appraisal work product standards
promulgated from time to time by the Standards Board
of the Appraisal Foundation, and promote industry
and government acceptance of such standards.
* To take a position that real estate work product
standards will be established by The Appraisal Standards
Board of the Appraisal Foundation.
* That the Federal government take no action regarding
the regulation or certification of appraisers that
would deprive a state or territory of the exclusive
prerogative as to licensing, registering or certifying
appraisers.
* To endorse the system of state licensing and certification
of real estate appraisers, recognizing Utah's right
to fashion the legislation as it deems appropriate.
Business Mobility
The expansion, relocation and/or continuation
of business activity should remain a decision of business
management based on economic considerations and not
be restricted by government for political reasons.
We oppose legislation and/or policies that would
mandate that business and manufacturing concerns report
in advance to government agencies and labor unions
any future plans to relocate or close their facilities.
Such a requirement holds the potential for intimidating
management with threats of costly delays and retribution
to affected employees and communities, would create
competitive disadvantages, adversely affect productivity
and increase consumer costs.
Consumer Protection
We urge REALTORS® and
all other participants in real estate transactions
to maintain and improve upon their efforts to serve
and protect the consuming public.
* We support efforts to stop government intervention
which can increase the cost of consumer borrowing,
place restrictions on services provided by industry
and cause unwarranted delay of transactions such as
the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA)
and the Truth-in-Lending Act (TIL) without harming
the overall goal of adequate and responsible consumer
protection.
State Ownership and Leasing of Public
Buildings
We are concerned about attempts to shift
into the hands of the State of Utah and local governments
a greater portion of the essentially commercial function
of providing facilities and space for government activities.
We are opposed to proposals which would require the
State of Utah and local governments to increase the
amount of government owned space by embarking upon
a major public building construction or acquisition
program. An increase in the number of government owned,
tax exempt facilities would reduce the tax base of
local governments, raise the real cost of providing
government space to the taxpayers, unnecessarily disrupt
a major traditional function performed by the private
sector, and would impede efforts to restrain the growth
of government spending.
Government Intervention, Regulation
and Control
We support broad regulatory reform such
as that pursued by Congress in recent years and the
concept of greater accountability of agency rule makers
to elected officials. Further, we endorse the need
to shift the burden of proof in justifying agency
regulations toward the agency.
Group Investment in Real Estate
Group investment in real estate enhances
the strength of Utah’s economy. Such investment contributes
to Utah’s goals, provides funds for commercial, single
family, multifamily and industrial facilities, and
encourages the productive use of capital. In recognition
of these contributions to Utah’s economy the State
of Utah, and its regulatory and taxation agencies,
should not reduce but encourage the efficient incentives
for real estate group investments and should not impede
the formation of these investment opportunities to
people who otherwise could not participate in such
investments.
We support the principle of full and understandable
disclosures for real estate group investments to enable
potential investors to make informed investment decisions.
Regulatory trends requiring an ever increasing amount
of information in the registration process have merely
confused and intimidated the investor with a large
volume of complex information. In light of capital
formation needs and the increasing expense of registration,
we urge the Congress and the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) and the State of Utah to provide
the small REALTOR® organizers of small
investment groups with realistic alternatives such
as expanded private offering exemptions.
We encourage continued cooperation and coordination
between the various regulatory agencies and the Utah
Legislature leading to the development and adoption
at the federal and state levels of model legislation
to bring about uniform and consistent regulation of
real estate group investments.
Seller Property Condition Disclosure
We strongly encourage property condition
disclosure by sellers of real property to potential
purchasers.
Confiscation of Real Property
We are concerned that the rights of
innocent real property owners be upheld in all cases
of the forfeiture of real property for illegal activity.
Innocent real property owners are those who had no
knowledge of the use of their property for illegal
activity or who, if they had such knowledge, made
reasonable efforts to alleviate the use of their property
for illegal activity. Any legislation addressing the
forfeiture of real property because of illegal activity
needs to contain language which protects the rights
of innocent owners.
REAL ESTATE FINANCE
ALTERNATIVE MORTGAGE INSTRUMENTS
We strongly support the continued availability
of the fixed-rate mortgage (FRM) which has been the
hallmark of residential mortgage finance for the last
40 years. We further support the use of alternative
mortgage instruments as options to the fixed rate
loan. However, given the complexity of adjustable
rate mortgages (ARMs), it is important that potential
homebuyers fully understand all the features of an
adjustable rate mortgage. Therefore, we strongly support
and will continue to work with mortgage lenders, Congress
and the appropriate regulatory bodies for the strengthening
and enforcement of disclosure requirements.
Further, we advocate and will continue to work for
the adoption of a single, uniform disclosure format
to be utilized by all lenders.
Automated Underwriting, Credit, and
Mortgage Scoring
Home ownership is the foundation of
stable neighborhoods, good citizenship and secure
communities. Innovations in the mortgage credit delivery
system is central to increasing home ownership opportunities
and assuring the consistent, cost effective availability
of mortgage credit.
Automated underwriting, accompanied by credit and
mortgage scoring, are significant innovations in the
mortgage credit delivery system. These innovations
are largely the result of risk management reengineering
at the residential secondary mortgage corporations,
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These government-sponsored
enterprises are currently indispensable to residential
mortgage lending and their advocacy of risk management
tools such as credit and mortgage scoring will profoundly
affect nearly every residential mortgage lender. This
influence even extends to the Federal Housing Administration.
The UTAH ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® strongly supports
the usage of technology to speed the mortgage finance
transaction and expand opportunities for home ownership.
We support the efficiencies, growth and innovations
of the residential secondary mortgage markets. We
strongly support the complementary role that the Federal
Housing Administration plays in the mortgage finance
system.
Ideally, automated underwriting and credit and mortgage
scoring benefit all participants in the home mortgage
transaction. However, when lenders misuse these tools,
the consumer is the one to suffer. The UTAH ASSOCIATION
OF REALTORS® recognizes the heavy reliance lenders
place on credit scoring to assess a customer's potential
credit risk, and believes lenders' confidence in credit
scores is misguided. The basis for Fair, Issac credit
bureau (FICO) scores, as related to mortgage finance,
is flawed because the integrity of the data contained
in the score is highly questionable; the components
of the score do not include some elements that are
fundamental to the mortgage lending process, e.g.,
capacity to repay the loan and collateral; and the
time required to correct errors in credit scores is
much too long. Additionally, a credit score does not
reflect accurately the behavior of potential home
ownership groups who could be good mortgage lending
risks.
The UTAH ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® strongly opposes
the use of FICO scores as the sole determinant of
mortgage finance eligibility. Instead we strongly
advocate using mortgage scoring in association with
automated underwriting. Further, in accordance with
the guidelines provided by Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac, lenders should use credit scores as a tool together
with other underwriting criteria, and make a practice
of having experienced underwriters process the more
problematic loan applications in order to ensure that
consumers receive fair, fast, and cost-effective mortgage
finance decisions.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should act affirmatively
to prevent pre-screening of mortgage loan applicants
by FICO scores alone, rather that using a mortgage
score.
The UTAH ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® should take
a highly visible role to alert and protect consumers'
credit scores. Public statements, counseling and other
consumer and lender educational efforts should be
employed to assure that consumers are aware of credit
and mortgage scoring, the need for good individual
credit management as a significant attribute for future
home ownership and securing mortgage credit.
Financial Entities Involvement in
Real Estate
We strongly oppose the authority of all financial
entities which benefit from federal deposit insurance,
favorable tax treatment, and special access to credit
(including their subsidiaries and divisions) to participate
in the business of real estate brokerage, fee appraising,
leasing, real estate development, real estate syndication,
property management and other real estate services
and/or activities not directly related to their primary
function. Such activities may conflict with the interests
of their customers, threaten the safety and financial
stability of the institution, increase the risk of
taxpayer liability and pose a threat to the competitive
structure of the real estate industry. We are also
opposed to long term holding of foreclosed property
by financial entities.
We further urge the appropriate regulators to use
their authority to restrain the expansion of real
estate activity by the State of Utah’s financial entities
and its federal counterparts. Where third party real
estate brokerage is allowed, those federally-insured
financial institutions should be subject to the following
standards and safeguards:
* Prohibit the use of the parent federally-insured
financial institution's name, trademark, logo, and
any indication of affiliation in public advertising
by the subsidiary.
* Prohibit joint advertising between federally-insured
financial institutions and related real estate brokerage
firms.
* Require federally-insured financial institutions
and real estate brokerage business operations to be
conducted in separate geographic facilities.
* Require complete separation between the federally-insured
financial institution and its operating subsidiaries.
The subsidiaries should have separate management and
staff, and should be independently operated.
* Limit and regulate the amount of capital investment
and working capital loans in real estate brokerage
subsidiaries from parent federally-insured financial
institutions.
* Limit and regulate investment and loans based on
the "legitimate" net worth of the parent federally-insured
financial institutions.
* Require full disclosure of potential conflict of
interest in situations where affiliated federally-insured
financial institutions and real estate brokerage companies
are involved in the same transactions, in order to
prevent the provision of preferential treatment based
on that affiliation.
* Prohibit the use of public or private communications
designed to create the impression that the subsidiary
real estate brokerage company has priority access
to the funds or credit of the parent federally-insured
financial institution, or is entitled to a preferential
interest rate for real estate loans.
* Prohibit the use of confidential credit information
available from the parent federally-insured financial
institution for solicitation purposes by a real estate
brokerage subsidiary.
* Limit the percentage of loans made by federally-insured
financial institutions to clients of real estate brokerage
subsidiaries.
* Require approval of the appropriate regulatory
bodies of federally-insured financial institution
investment in non-financial subsidiaries, such as
real estate brokerage companies.
* Require appropriate regulatory agencies to periodically
review and audit the records and statements of federally-insured
financial institutions with subsidiaries to ensure
and enforce compliance and protect against unsafe
and un-sound practices.
* Require strict enforcement of regulations and safeguards
designed to prevent an anti-competitive environment.
* Require imposition and implementation of stiff
penalties for violation of regulations mentioned above.
* Require real estate brokerage subsidiaries to comply
with the real estate licensing laws and regulations
of the appropriate real estate commission.
As recently approved statutory and regulatory changes
to the nation's financial services industry in the
early 1990s are implemented, we anticipate an increasingly
important need for structural reform. Historical laws
governing the activities of insured depository institutions
(i.e. Banking Holding Company Act, National Bank Act,
Glass-Steagall act, Savings and Loan Holding Company
Act) may be replaced by a more streamlined statutory
organizational structure in which regulation of banking
and non-banking activities will be based upon function.
Major factors driving reform in the marketplace include
the need to: (1) restore competitiveness (lost through
legal restrictions and technological advances) to
our financial system; (2) enhance the flow of capital
into investment and economic growth; and (3) avoid
taxpayer exposure to further losses from the federal
deposit insurance system.
We recognize that these changes have created new
forms of business relationships or affiliations between
insured depository institutions and real estate firms
and that the business needs of REALTORS®
whose firms are or may choose to be, affiliated with
insured depository institutions under the ownership
of a common parent may be adversely affected in the
absence of structural change.
We accept a structural reform which creates new entities,
provided that such structure prohibits insured depository
institutions from engaging (directly or indirectly)
in real estate activities. To that end, we support
the establishment of two new structural entities--the
Diversified Holding Company (DHC) and the Financial
Services Holding Company (FSHC), as previously approved
by the Board of Directors at the 1991 Mid-Year Legislative
Meetings. DHCs would be permitted to own both: (1)
uninsured and separately capitalized "non-banking"
subsidiaries which are permitted to engage in diversified
financial services, including real estate, insurance,
securities and mortgage banking; and (2) a Financial
Services Holding Company subsidiary which itself could
own an insured depository institution subsidiary.
Any new structure must insulate (through the establishment
of "firewalls") the activities of the FSHC and its
insured depository institution subsidiary from the
DHC and any of its non-banking affiliates. These would
include, but not be limited to, the following:
* Disclosure. An insured depository institution subsidiary
(or its subsidiary) of the FSHC must make a written
disclosure to a real estate affiliate's customer that
any product or program of the real estate affiliate
is not federally-insured and neither guaranteed by,
nor an obligation of, the depository institution.
* Joint and Cross-Marketing. An insured depository
institution subsidiary for its subsidiary) of the
FSHC shall not cross-market or jointly reference its
products and services with those of the real estate
affiliate. This proscription includes joint advertising
or other media disseminated to promote or solicit
business.
* Depository institutions and real estate affiliates
are prohibited from either indicating or implying
that any benefits could result from their affiliation.
* Solicitation. An insured depository institution
subsidiary of the FSHC can not, directly or indirectly,
solicit real estate business for the real estate affiliate
related to the provision of a commercial or real estate
loan.
* Preferential Treatment. An insured depository institution
affiliate cannot, directly or indirectly, solicit
real estate business for the real estate affiliate
related to the provision of a commercial or real estate
loan.
* Non-Public Customer Information. An insured depository
institution cannot, directly or indirectly, use non-public
customer information to solicit real estate business
without the prior written consent of the customer.
Such written consent shall be clearly set forth and
explained to the customer.
* Market Separation. The insured depository institution
subsidiary of the FSHC and the real estate affiliate
shall be held out to the public as separate, and customers
shall be sufficiently informed of the separate identities
through separate names, separate business locations
and separate logos and letterheads.
* Legal Separation. An insured depository institution
subsidiary of the FSHC shall be legally separate from
the real estate affiliate i.e., it shall be incorporated
as a separate company, operated as a separate business
unit, and organized with its own separate board of
directors and management.
* Financial Separation. An insured depository
institution subsidiary of the FSHC shall be financially
separate from the real estate affiliate. Each shall
be adequately and separately funded with no commingling
of assets. Additionally, an insured depository institution
subsidiary is restricted to the percentage limits
established in Section 23A of the Federal Reserve
Act for purposes of loans or extensions of credit
to its affiliates (including real estate affiliates)
and the transfer of assets between it and its affiliates
(including real estate affiliates).
Mortgage Credit Availability
Thrift institutions have long been a
primary source of residential mortgage loans. However,
past deregulatory measures adopted by Congress have
had the effect of diminishing the role of the thrift
industry as providers of mortgage credit. We support
policies that allow thrifts to maintain mortgage lending
as their primary business activity. As revisions to
the thrift charter are adopted, nothing should mandate
that savings and loan institutions should be forced
to abandon housing finance as a principal line of
business. At the same time, we recognize the need
to develop new sources of mortgage finance to meet
future housing needs. To that end, we support the
following:
* Legislative and regulatory proposals which encourage
pension fund investment in mortgages, while maintaining
current "arms length" standards contained in the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) regulations.
* Continued development of highly marketable mortgage
backed securities designed to attract new investment
in housing from non-traditional sources, including,
but not limited to Real Estate Mortgage Investment
Conduits (REMICs), as vehicles to improve the ability
of mortgage backed securities to compete in the marketplace,
should be adopted. The Federal National Mortgage Association
(FNMA) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
(FHLMC), as major participants in the secondary mortgage
market, should be authorized to issue these securities.
* The Federal Home Loan Bank System is traditionally
an important source of medium- and long-term funds
to member institutions that facilitate residential
mortgage lending. We support modernizing the structure
and membership criteria provided that the System's
focus on providing support and facilitating residential
mortgage lending continues as a principal mission
objective.
* Availability of commercial debt and equity capital.
Specifically, we support the development and maintenance
of a liquid commercial secondary mortgage market.
We support the creation of a legislative, regulatory
and technical environment favorable to the development
and maintenance of this market.
Secondary Mortgage Market Institutions
The secondary mortgage market has become
increasingly important to the development of mortgage
capital in the marketplace. We continue to strongly
oppose any attempts to fully privatize or weaken the
authority and efficiency of the existing secondary
mortgage market institutions, Federal National Mortgage
Association (FNMA) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (FHLMC).
POSITIONS ON OTHER
CURRENT ISSUES
Community Revitalization
One of the nation's most challenging
opportunities in housing lies in the recovery and
rehabilitation of declining neighborhoods. To that
end, we support efforts by the State of Utah, and
local governments therein, to implement enterprise
zone programs as viable frameworks to foster community
revitalization and economic growth. REALTORS®
hold the greatest potential for initiating and coordinating
the resources and methods for restoration of neighborhood
housing and commerce.
The UAR urges its local boards and individual members
to actively participate in and promote community revitalization
efforts that are designed to maintain and improve
the quality of life in the neighborhoods of our cities,
towns and communities. We applaud the action of communities
that have implemented community revitalization programs
without government assistance and continue to encourage
the involvement of the private sector to take advantage
of the present investment possibilities.
Community Service
In order to promote meaningful public
service programs to upgrade the quality of life in
their communities, we support REALTOR®
Community Service programs to involve local boards
of REALTORS® and the UAR.
To that end, the UAR has formed the Utah Association
of REALTORS® Housing Opportunities Fund (UARHOF)—which
is funded with the interest generated from broker
trust accounts and charitable contributions—to enhance
the ability of Utah citizens to secure housing.
We support the concept of legislative proposals to
establish programs that encourage community service,
provided that such programs includes provisions which
limit its cost and allow participants to use any financial
incentives offered under such a program for down payments,
closing costs, or other costs associated with purchasing
a home.
Education and Research
We recognize the vital necessity of
professional competency to meet the challenges of
real estate practice in an increasingly sophisticated
and complex society.
Professionalism in real estate through education
and training is one of the primary objectives of the
UTAH ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®. We recognize
our responsibility to the members of the Association
to assist:
*REALTORS® and REALTOR®
ASSOCIATES® in identifying and obtaining
opportunities for real estate education and training;
Affiliates of the UTAH ASSOCIATION OF REALTOR®
in their educational activities, each within its specialization
and in mutually beneficial co-operative ventures;
* Local boards in their offering of educational,
training and research programs and in the formation
of centers for real estate research;
* Universities and colleges in the offering of their
curricula of real estate courses and research in the
general field of real estate;
*The State of Utah in adopting and implementing specific
requirements for continuing education.
We endorse reciprocal education and license renewal
credits among:
* State REALTOR® Institutes;
* The Societies, Institutes and Councils of the NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®; and,
* State licensing authorities.
We recognize our need to share our knowledge with
the general public and our responsibility to our members
through the development and dissemination of timely
real estate programs which relate member services
to the needs of clients and customers.
General Statement of Housing Policy
As an Association, we reaffirm the national
goal of "a decent home and a suitable living environment
for every family." This commitment, which also needs
to be raised to the highest level of national priorities,
encompasses the entire housing ladder from the homeless
to the first-time homebuyer. We, the UTAH ASSOCIATION
OF REALTORS®, recognize the housing needs that
are present among low-income households and renters
and we also recognize that these are the very families
who will eventually become homeowners. We strongly
endorse the reliance on local and state initiatives
and public private partnerships that are such a crucial
part of the Report of the National Housing Task Force.
Independent Contractor Relationship
We support independent contractor requirements
with respect to worker's compensation and unemployment
insurance that do not conflict with federal and state
law.
International Real Estate and Foreign
Investment
The market for real property and real
estate finance has been and is increasingly international.
Recognition of the fundamental benefits of private
property ownership continues to expand worldwide.
As a consequence, the effects of international events
upon continued growth and stability in our industry
and country are critical.
We believe that the same basic principles that we
espouse nationally, which are support for private
ownership and the free enterprise system, have worldwide
application. We should vigorously press private property
philosophies in the international community and take
a highly visible leadership role in the development
of a collective private sector position on international
housing and development issues.
We support the right of foreign investors to acquire
U.S. real property and the right of U.S. investors
to acquire property abroad. We oppose laws and regulations
that in any way hinder those rights. We also support
the free flow of international finance for real estate
and oppose any laws and regulations that impede that
flow.
We believe that foreign investors in U.S. real estate
should be subject to the same rates of taxation as
U.S. investors. As far as is practically possible,
systems for taxing foreign investors should be no
more onerous than those applied to U.S. investors.
In addition, any unique reporting and disclosure requirements
on foreign investors and/or their agents should be
kept to a minimum.
License Law
To promote increased competency in the industry,
we urge that:
* Specific educational requirements be a pre-requisite
for licensing and specific continuing education requirements
be a condition for license renewal.
* The Division of Real Estate be empowered with adequate
statutes to provide the opportunity for redress to
the public.
* Reciprocity of licensing between states be encouraged
where it is mutually advantageous.
*The UAR and its member local boards strive to improve
the State of Utah’s license laws and, when appropriate,
recommend the use of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTOR®
Suggested Pattern Real Estate License Law.
* License laws should address developments in the
industry such as the management of condominium, co-operative,
and homeowner's associations and that questions regarding
these new developments should be added to the testing
process. As these are real estate activities, they
should require a license and supervision under Utah's
existing real estate licensing laws.
* The UAR supports laws or regulations requiring
auctioneers, who auction real property, to be licensed
with the Division of Real Estate under Title 61 of
the Utah Code or perform real estate auction sales
in conjunction.
|